Showing posts with label Deviance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Deviance. Show all posts

Thursday, February 14, 2013

Freedom Riders, PBS

Wow, I forgot this was coming on.  What a great documentary.  So powerful.  The Civil Rights Movement could only gain that much steam with the power of cameras and television.   Unfortunately, I missed parts, so I'll have to come back and watch it online:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/freedomriders/watch

Here are some key points that caught my attention:

1.  There is a segment where the story of the Riders is broadcast in the Communist Bloc.  This is intriguing, because it put the abstract ideals America stands for in stark contrast a concrete reality shown to the world.  That was a Cold War blow, and it is often something overlooked. 

2.  The prison system where the riders were sentenced, and the labor they were pressed in to for their challenging the system.  Wow. The chain gang is an interesting experience. 

3.  Robert F. Kennedy (Archival):
"A great change is at hand, and our task, our obligation is to make that revolution, that change, peaceful and constructive for all. Those who do nothing are inviting shame as well as violence. Those who act boldly are recognizing right as well as reality."   -- Wow.   I am called to act.  How do I act like I didn't hear this? 
 
I am curious what others thought of the show. 

Monday, January 28, 2013

"Is BET Reverse Racism?"

       This is touchy and difficult question and concept.  Racism is acting on a set of beliefs that based on the concept of race.  So what is race?  That is hard to explain, and becoming more fluid.  Scholars are not sure they want to pin down the concept of race in 2013.  It is an historical concept, but seems to have outlived its usefulness.  Prejudice is common, and we all live with some form of it, regardless of were we come from.  Acting on prejudice is a problem, and so it is best to be aware of ones prejudice and work to negate actions that may be based on that prejudice. 
     When prejudice becomes mainstream and moves in to the actions of institutions (companies, governments, schools, and any organization that has authority), if prejudice becomes embedded in the practice of this institution, the effects may be devastating.  For example, women not being allowed to attempt to gain a place in combat roles in the military means that women will not advance beyond a basic level.  If one is judged without being given a straight chance to prove their abilities, they are limited incredibly. 
        With this in mind, we come back to the question of black culture celebrated in television, magazines, and other cultural sources.  Is there anything racist about BET? A television show that demonstrates black culture is seen as a threat to the hegemony of white culture.  But why?  Is it racist?  No.  By promoting only black culture, it is not committing a crime, nor is it really threatening to hold back any white actor.  Is BET an entry point for white actors hoping to make it big, duly qualified, but unable to because the producers and execs at the channel don't find the actor to be dark enough?  Not likely to happen.  A celebration of a particular culture does not negate the pride other cultures should be allowed to feel about their own.  The KKK is more than welcome to celebrate white culture and offer up scholarships for white children.  There are white ethnic holidays (St. Patrick was not black, and neither were Lincoln and Washington, or Columbus, although he did speak Spanish). 
         So, what if we had a commercial on television dominated by white people?  Would that offend anyone?  What if we had a magazine full of white people?  What if we went in to a store and all the pictures on the walls were white?  Or just a vast majority, with a black person or Asian person tossed in to even it out, so it doesn't seem like a KKK convention?  Would it surprise anyone that the KKK has a television channel?  I just looked again, and although I won't post their link directly, it doesn't take a lot to google them.  The following is from their television channel, a section for youth. 

Andrew would like to talk to kids for a few minutes each week. He is proud to be a white Christian boy in America, but he knows that because of his minority status, the odds might be stacked against his people. Kids will enjoy hearing a few comments from Andrew as he warns them of things to watch out for because he cares!

The language attempts to mimic the voice of ethnic minorities in the American past who attempted to rally together without institutional power.  Unfortunately, Andrew does have institutional power largely on his side, and the deck is not stacked against him.  He just doesn't like to share. 
      So, no, BET is not reverse racism.  Can a black person be prejudiced against whites?  Yes.  Also very likely is prejudice against a fellow black of a different shade, suprisingly.  We are more complex in our dislikes than we are credited with being.  The real question, when dealing with racism, should be who has the power to enforce their prejudice.  You don't have to like me or what I write.  As long as you are not in my classroom, you will never have to fear whether my prejudice is being used against you.  That is truly the only realm where I have the power to use my prejudice.  Lucky for those who are in my classroom, I am very aware of my prejudice, and work hard to keep it in check.  We all live with prejudice.  The key is learning to balance your feeling with your reality.  To take a deep breath, walk up to your prejudice, put your hand out, take a risk, and pull the mask of the boogey man off.  Ultimately, if we truly believe in a just God, we believe that humans by nature are good.  So, don't be so afraid of them.  Don't look for the worst in people.  Instead, until you get burned personally, treat me as a human being.  Give me a chance to disappoint you. 

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

A small dissection of the Marine Corps urination scandal


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/01/12/panetta-orders-probe-video-showing-marines-urinating-on-dead-taliban/

I was in no big hurry to follow up on this story, but I felt that I must deal with it at some point. This post is not to pass judgement but to look at a few issues.

1.  In the article, Fox News uses the word desecration in parentheses ("desecrating" the bodies).  From a sociological perspective, if these were American dead, and anyone was urinating on them, would we hesitate to call it a desecration? 

2.  Bad things happen in war.  Morals are not instilled in war time.  They are very often shed.  These men should be judged by a jury of peers, not the media or the public.  Unfortunately, their actions will be viewed by many, and it is not our mainstream media that will be the problem.  We can not filter what others find on the internet (where this video posted), and how it is used against us.  My fear is for future U.S. military personnel in the wake of this incident.  There are numerous examples of group actions that are not reflective of mainstream cultural norms in American history. This is not a new phenomenon, but as the author of the essay points out, "It shows how, in the present era of instant communication and YouTube, a tactical judgment blunder by a small number of troops can become a big strategic problem in a matter of a few hours."  An isolated incident is no longer an isolated incident. 

3.  The concept of the other plays perfectly here.  It would have been much more difficult to have done this to someone that resemble the Marines.  Because of the differences in language, diet and smell, culture, and appearance, this behavior was more acceptable.  The Japanese skull on the desk of the young girl writing her boyfriend in the Pacific. . .

4.  The justification is that these men had suffered losses at the hands of an enemy that did not fight fairly.  The same logic is used to defend the American soldiers at My Lai, under Lt. Calley.  Ultimately, if we seek to do terrible things, we will find a way to justify them, also. 

5.  God be with the soldiers and their families, especially.  Their careers are probably over.  And, God be with our enemies.  Some day we will all understand this war and find some type of peace. 

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Link following up on Power and Authority

Following up on our study of the LAPD, power, and authority, I came across this link.  This is the site I cite often in class, so no surprise.  What can you interpret from the graphs, though?  The author of the post sums it  up for you.  If one were to leave the provacative title off, and just look at the graphs, would it cause the same reaction?  Something to build on. . .


Racial Profiling link

Sunday, October 31, 2010

The Modern American prison cell.  Compare to Finnish.




Zimbardo's experiment played out, with a touch of Milgram.  People of Iraq tend to fear dogs, and are fairly modest.  Nudity and barking canines are non normative.  For an authority figure to play actively against the normative behavior of a group, does this constitute torture in and of itself? 


Lynndie England is the young woman in the following photos.  Male nudity before a woman that is not a family relation (wife) is not allowed in the culture.  Also, naked male to male contact is not acceptable.  These photos were widely circulated at the time, and provide a good stepping off point for the discussion of power and authority. 


Social Control and Prison




These are examples of Finnish prison cells.  How do they differ from American prison cells, and what effect does this have on recidivism?  What is the purpose of prison:  Social control or resocialization?