Posted on Sun, Jan. 04, 2009
Navy board to review status of missing pilot, a KC native
By BEN EVANSThe Associated Press
WASHINGTON The family of a Navy pilot missing since his plane was shot down in the Persian Gulf War isn’t ready to give up hope that he is alive.
Capt. Michael Scott Speicher’s family says they will oppose any decision to declare him killed in action.
The Navy has scheduled a review board hearing for today on the status of Speicher, who has been missing since January 1991, when his FA-18 Hornet was shot down in Iraq on the first night of the war.
The hearing comes several months after the Navy received a fresh intelligence report on Speicher from Iraq.
Speicher was born in Kansas City and attended Winnetonka High School before his family moved to Jacksonville, Fla., when he was 15.
Speicher’s family, which has seen the latest intelligence report, thinks Navy Secretary Donald Winter is moving toward changing Speicher’s status from missing/captured to killed, said Cindy Laquidara, the family’s lawyer and spokeswoman.
The family — including two college-age children who were toddlers when Speicher went missing — thinks the Pentagon should do more to determine definitively what happened, Laquidara said. They see the outcome as setting a standard for future missing-in-action investigations, she said.
“This really is a precedent for every other captive serviceman or woman, and it needs to be done right,” Laquidara said. “We’ve looked at the information that’s going to be presented to the board, and we feel pretty confident that it’s not time under the standards that they’ve set to change the status. There are things that need to be done before one can be certain.”
Speicher was the first American lost in the Gulf War.
Some think Speicher ejected from the plane and was captured by Iraqi forces, and potential clues later emerged that he might have survived: The initials “MSS” were found scrawled on a prison wall in Baghdad, for example, and there were reports of sightings.
The Pentagon has changed Speicher’s status several times. He was publicly declared killed in action hours after his plane went down. Ten years later, the Navy changed Speicher’s status to missing in action, citing an absence of evidence that he had died.
In October 2002, the Navy switched Speicher’s status to “missing/captured,” although it has never said what evidence it had that he was ever in captivity.
Another review was done in 2005 with information gleaned after Baghdad fell in the U.S.-led invasion, which allowed American officials to search inside Iraq. The review board recommended then that the Pentagon work with the State Department, the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad and the
Iraqi government to “increase the level of attention and effort inside Iraq” to resolve the question of Speicher’s fate.
The Defense Intelligence Agency, which tracks the cases of missing military personnel and works with other intelligence agencies, submitted its latest report last fall.
“Captain Speicher’s status remains a top priority for the Navy and the U.S. government,” Cmdr. Cappy Surette, a Navy spokesman, said recently. “The recent intelligence community assessment reflects exhaustive analysis of information related to Captain Speicher’s case.”
The final decision on changing Speicher’s status must come from the secretary of the Navy; the review board’s decision is only a recommendation, said Lt. Sean Robertson, another Navy spokesman.
Robertson said that once the board meets, it has up to 30 days to complete its report. The family then would have up to 30 days to comment on the board’s recommendation before it is forwarded to the secretary for a decision.
The board will be composed of three officers, including one who is experienced in F/A-18 aircraft. The board has a legal adviser assigned and a legal counsel also will represent Speicher to look after the interests of him and his family, Robertson said.
Laquidara said family members would attend the hearing.
“It’s really easy to put out a yellow ribbon but not so easy to allocate resources to find a missing serviceman or woman,” she said. “If Scott’s not alive now, he was for a very long time, and that could happen to somebody else.”
No comments:
Post a Comment